![]() In fact, the source code is constantly being reviewed by many independent researchers and users. TrueCrypt is open-source, but has anybody actually reviewed the source code? ![]() The requirement to use a browser plugin was seen as a significant setback. Cryptocat was supposed to be something anyone could use, simply by using a Website. Notoriously, most encryption and privacy technologies are difficult for novices to set up and use properly, and require preparation in advance. OTR, meaning "off the record", is intended to be private and repudiable, but not anonymous: by design, it's supposed to be impossible to prove what the participants in an OTR chat said to each other.Ĭryptocat was supposed to fill a particular niche. ![]() There are lots of use cases in which it makes sense to keep the contents of a communication private, without being concerned about anonymity: communications between a doctor and a patient, or contract negotiations, or the like. The intention is that PGP signatures should eventually be recognized as legally binding. PGP is, by design, emphatically *not* anonymous it's supposed to be non-repudiable, meaning that when you use your private key to sign an email or a file, it's definitely you, the person with the private key, who did. Click to expand.I thought that addendum to the article suggested a lack of understanding of the intentions of PGP, compared to the other privacy technologies. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |